Do patients want to be told when a practice uses AI?

Yes, and by a wide margin. In an August 2026 Pew Research Center survey, 72% of US adults said it is extremely or very important that a provider tells them when AI is used in their care. Support was highest for anything touching a medical decision, over 80% for reading scans, making diagnoses, or explaining lab results, but even routine tasks mattered: 56% wanted disclosure when AI is used just to schedule an appointment. The takeaway for a practice is simple. If AI touches the patient at any point, most people expect to be told, not to find out later.

Do I have to disclose it if AI only answers my phones or books appointments?

There is no single federal law requiring it in every state yet, but patient expectation is clear and a few states have started passing AI disclosure rules. In the Pew data, 56% of adults wanted to be told even when AI is only scheduling. The practical answer is to disclose anyway. It costs you nothing, it protects trust, and it is far better than a patient realizing on their own that the friendly voice was a bot. The easiest fix is an AI receptionist that introduces itself as an assistant and always offers a human, so disclosure is built into the first sentence.

Will telling patients I use AI scare them away?

Handled well, it does the opposite. What erodes trust is hidden AI that a patient discovers by accident. Pew found 46% of adults were unsure whether AI had even been used in their own care, and 53% felt they had little or no say, which is exactly the gap that breeds suspicion. Being upfront, in plain language, that you use AI to handle scheduling or reminders so your team can focus on patients, reads as confidence and respect. The tone matters more than the fact. Say it plainly, explain the why, and make a human easy to reach.

What does the AMA say about AI transparency in medicine?

The American Medical Association has built its position around what it calls trustworthy augmented intelligence, with ethics, evidence, and equity as the pillars, and transparency named as a must. Its principles call for AI in health care to be ethical, equitable, responsible, and transparent, and in 2026 the AMA released patient facing guidance to help people navigate AI in their care. The AMA prefers the term augmented intelligence to stress that these tools should support clinicians, not replace the human relationship. For a practice, the message lines up with the patient data: use AI, but be open about it.

How should a small practice disclose that it uses AI?

Keep it short, plain, and visible where the AI actually shows up. Have an AI receptionist say it is an assistant and offer a human at any time. Add one honest line to your website and intake forms explaining that you use AI for tasks like scheduling and reminders and that a real person is always available. Train the front desk to answer the question if a patient asks. You do not need a legal essay. You need a clear, human sentence at each point AI touches the patient, plus an easy path to a person. That combination satisfies the expectation almost every patient has.

AI Transparency in Healthcare

Doctor sitting at a desk facing the camera, representing patient trust and AI transparency in a medical practice — Patients are not against AI in their care. They mostly just want to be told when it is there. Photo via Pexels.

On August 25, 2026, the Pew Research Center published a survey that should be on the wall of every practice owner thinking about AI. The headline number is blunt: 72% of US adults say it is extremely or very important that a doctor or their office tells them when AI is used in their care. Not a niche worry. Not a generational thing. Nearly three out of four patients, across the board.

And here is the uncomfortable part. In the same survey, 46% of people were not even sure whether AI had been used in their own care, and 53% said they feel they have little or no say over it. So you have a huge majority who want to be told, sitting next to a huge majority who suspect they are being kept in the dark. That space in between is where trust slowly leaks out of a practice. This is the AI transparency gap, and it is worth understanding before it becomes your problem.

Patients are not anti AI. They are anti being surprised

It would be easy to read those numbers as fear of technology. The details say otherwise. When Pew asked which uses people most want disclosed, the pattern was clear and reasonable. The higher the stakes, the more they want to know:

Reading medical scans: 81% want to be told.
Making a diagnosis: 81%.
Explaining lab results: 80%.
Taking notes during the visit: 72%.
Ordering prescription refills: 64%.
Scheduling an appointment: 56%.

Look at the bottom of that list. Even for something as routine as booking a visit, more than half of patients still want to know a machine did it. That is the line most practice owners get wrong. They assume disclosure only matters for the clinical, high stakes stuff, so the AI that answers the phone or books the slot slides in silently. But a majority of your patients would rather know that too. Being surprised is the thing they dislike, not the tool itself.

56% of adults want to be told when AI is used just to schedule an appointment, per Pew Research, August 2026. The front desk is exactly where most small practice AI lives, and exactly where owners forget to say anything.

The doctors already made the leap

This is not a hypothetical worry for later. AI is already in the building. The American Medical Association reported that physician use of AI has climbed fast, with the majority of physicians now using at least one AI tool in their work, roughly double the share from just a couple of years earlier. Ambient scribes that write your notes, tools that draft patient messages, AI that answers calls after hours: adoption is running well ahead of the conversation practices are having with patients about it.

That mismatch is the risk. When the technology moves faster than the disclosure, you get the exact gap Pew measured, providers leaning on AI in the background while patients are left guessing. And patients are not naive. They can tell when a text reply sounds a little too smooth, or when the voice on the phone never stumbles. Guessing breeds distrust far faster than a plain sentence of honesty ever would.

What the AMA is actually saying

The professional side is catching up to this in public. The AMA has built its stance around what it calls trustworthy augmented intelligence, resting on three pillars: ethics, evidence, and equity. Its principles for AI in health care ask that these tools be ethical, equitable, responsible, and transparent, and in 2026 the group put out patient facing guidance to help people navigate AI in their own care.

Two things there are worth borrowing even if you never read the full document. First, the AMA deliberately says augmented intelligence instead of artificial intelligence, to make the point that these tools should support the human relationship, not stand in for it. Second, transparency is not a footnote in their framework. It sits right at the front. The people setting the ethical bar for medicine and the patients answering surveys are, for once, saying the same thing: use the technology, but be open about it.

Why hiding it is the expensive option

Some owners hesitate to disclose because they worry it makes the practice look less personal, or that patients will bristle. The data points the other way. The damage does not come from using AI. It comes from a patient finding out on their own that they were talking to a bot, or that a message they thought was from their nurse was generated. That is the moment a relationship takes a hit, and you rarely get to see it happen. They just do not rebook.

Think about the phone. A patient calls with a real concern, gets a smooth AI voice that never says what it is, hits a wall it cannot handle, and cannot reach a person. Now they are annoyed and they feel a little tricked. Compare that to an assistant that opens with, in plain words, that it is an AI helper for the front desk and a team member is one request away. Same technology. Opposite feeling. The honesty is the entire difference, and it is free. We wrote more on this tension in how to use AI without losing patient trust, and on the specific question of whether to tell patients when AI answers.

A simple disclosure playbook for a practice

You do not need a policy binder or a legal essay. You need a clear, human sentence everywhere AI touches the patient, plus an easy path to a real person. Here is the whole thing:

Four places to be upfront

On the phone. If AI answers, have it introduce itself as an assistant in the first breath and offer a human at any time. No pretending to be staff.
On your website. One honest line: you use AI for things like scheduling and reminders so your team can spend more time with patients, and a real person is always reachable.
In messages. If automated texts or emails go out, make it obvious they are automated and give a way to reply to a human.
At the front desk. Make sure your team can answer the question honestly if a patient asks whether they were talking to a bot. A confident, simple yes beats a fumble.

Notice what this is not. It is not apologizing for using AI, and it is not burying a disclosure in a privacy policy nobody reads. It is naming the tool plainly at the moment it shows up, explaining the why in one line, and keeping a human within reach. That combination answers the expectation almost every patient in the Pew survey was describing. If you are still choosing a tool, our guide on what to check before you sign an AI vendor covers the disclosure questions worth asking upfront.

How EtherealMinds builds this in

We are not neutral on this, because we build AI into the practices we work with, and we think the honest version is also the version that grows a practice. When we set up our AI receptionist for a clinic, it introduces itself as an assistant, it never poses as your staff, and it hands off to a human the moment a patient wants one or the conversation gets beyond routine. Disclosure is not a checkbox we add later. It is the first sentence.

Inside our patient acquisition system, the same rule runs through the automated reminders, the booking flows, and the follow ups: patients always know when they are dealing with automation and always have a clear way to reach a person. The point of AI in a practice is to catch the calls you were missing and free your team for the humans in front of them, not to trick anyone. Done that way, the technology earns trust instead of spending it. Given what Pew just measured, that is not only the ethical call. It is the smart one.

Our honest take

The survey settles a debate a lot of owners were having with themselves. Patients are fine with AI in their care, and 72% simply want to be told when it is there, even for the small stuff like booking a slot. The practices that will win the next few years are not the ones that use the most AI or the least. They are the ones that are the most upfront about it. Say it plainly, keep a human easy to reach, and let the honesty do the work. It is the cheapest trust builder you have, and right now most of your competitors are skipping it.

Using AI at your front desk, or thinking about it?

Book a free strategy call. We will look at where AI can catch the calls and bookings you are losing today, and set it up the honest way, so patients always know what they are talking to and can always reach a person. No pressure, just a clear plan that grows trust instead of risking it.

Book a free strategy call →

Do Patients Want to Know When You Use AI?